Dear Representative Klein
[chair, Vt. House Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]
I was taken aback to hear you state in a VPR report by John Dillon today
that the Ellenburg and Clinton wind energy projects in New York "brought
to one of the poorest counties $1 billion, injected into their local
economy within four years."
Like most figures claimed for wind power, this obviously has no basis in
fact.
The developer's own web site says: "Together, the Noble Ellenburg
Windpark and its neighboring Noble Clinton Windpark, represent a $360
million investment in clean, renewable energy that will bring an
estimated $231 million in new revenue to the Ellenburg and Clinton
economies over the next 20 years."
(www.noblepower.com/our-windparks/ellenburg/) Most of the $360
million went to GE and the crane operators, and "estimated" should throw
up warning flags about what those communities will really see over the
next two decades, especially when maintenance costs increase and the tax
avoidance schemes expire. (See, e.g.,
(blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendID=137120338&blogID=470655268),
which is apparently an excerpt from an article in North American
Windpower (www.nawindpower.com/page.php?5).)
Roughly 75% of that money comes from taxpayers, even as the lion's share
of the profits goes into the bank accounts of a few "investors". Surely
a few hundred million dollars could be spent to greater benefit. How
many old houses could be insulated with that kind of money? That option
lacks the thrusting symbolism of industrial wind power, but it has the
advantage of actually making a positive difference.
Dillon also said that you said that the state needs new energy sources
as existing power contracts phase out. You must know that wind is
intermittent and highly variable and thus does not relieve the burden of
finding other sources, or even measurably reduce their use when the wind
does blow -- since they have to stay on line ready to kick back in when
the wind drops again. (And you must have missed the story from Canada
yesterday that Hydro-Quebec is eager to expand its sales to the U.S.:
(www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1295265).)
Wind's record is hardly a compelling reason to industrialize farmland as
in Clinton County, New York -- much less so sensitive ridgelines.
Unless, of course, developing our ridgelines -- with "clean green" wind
energy clearing the way with roads and transmission lines -- is exactly
what you want. After all, construction and maintenance of McCondos bring
steady work and tax revenue, whereas bats and bears, rocks and trees,
starlit skies and clean water, simply don't give back the same way.
~~~
Eric Rosenbloom
Hartland
Feb. 17, 2009
H O M E
It's not the view, it's the vision.